|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:... Does asking the occupants of a parked vehicle for their identification constitute an investigative detention for which reasonable suspicion is required?... Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED... Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED... Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:... Whether testamentary trustees who were paid a commission on principal for executor services prior to 1945 may receive an additional commission on principal for their ordinary services as trustees...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court VACATED, and the matter REMANDED to that court for consideration of the issue in light of Berry v. Berry, 898 A.2d 1100, 1104 (Pa. Super. 2006) (in determining income for support purposes, trial court may not include income constituting marital property under 23 Pa.C.S. § 3501, as such action would foreclose equitable distribution of those assets). Jurisdiction...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED...
|
|
May 28, 2010
Before this Court is an appeal of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) dated December 17, 2008 that granted a Motion to Partially Lift the Stay Entered October 25, 2000 filed by Appellees, a Medical Provider Class (Providers). The trial court granted Providers' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment finding that SEPTA is liable for interest on "overdue" bills under the Motor Vehicle...
|
|
May 28, 2010
Inservco Insurance Services, Inc., the third party administrator for Findlay Township's workers' compensation carrier, petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Board). The Board affirmed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) to reinstate total disability compensation to David Phillis (Claimant) and to assess a penalty against Inservco for violating the Workers' Compensation Act.1 The WCJ held that because Inservco made certain payments...
|